Evaluation of Written Assignment on Supporting Teaching and Learning

Evaluation Criteria

1. Grammar and Syntax
   • Correct use of grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure.
2. Factual Correctness
   • Accuracy of dates, definitions, and legislative references.
3. Writing Style
   • Clarity, coherence, and academic tone.
4. Plagiarism
   • Originality of the content and proper citations if needed.
5. Correspondence to the Topic
   • Relevance to the assigned topic: Supporting Teaching and Learning.
6. Mathematical Calculations and Definitions
   • Correctness of any calculations or definitions associated with educational terms.

Evaluation Results

1. Grammar and Syntax

The text contains several grammatical errors, including sentence fragments and awkward phrasing that impacts clarity. For example, "this is the act of legislation that's brought together through equality laws in the UK and it aims to prevent any sort of discrimination" could be revised for conciseness and clarity.

Mark: 6/10

2. Factual Correctness

• The assignment incorrectly states that the Children and Families Act 2014 comes into law at the same time as the Children's and Families Act 2012. In fact, these are two separate pieces of legislation with different implications.
• The SEND Code of Practice 2015 correctly identifies guidance for special educational needs but should be referenced more clearly to clarify what "Codes" are being compared.
• Accurate dates were included for some international conventions but lacked clear citations.

Mark: 7/10

3. Writing Style

The writing style lacks coherence and organization. It jumps between topics (e.g., legislation, principles of education, rights of the child) without clear transitions or headings. An academic tone is attempted but is lost in a convoluted presentation.

Mark: 5/10

4. Plagiarism

The assignment does not attribute sources for direct references to legislation or articles of the United Nations Convention, creating a risk of plagiarism. It is essential to either paraphrase effectively or quote and cite sources.

Mark: 4/10

5. Correspondence to the Topic

The text partially addresses the topic of supporting teaching and learning, especially in relation to legislation. However, it could more explicitly connect these legislations to practical implications for teaching practices and learning environments.

Mark: 6/10

6. Mathematical Calculations and Definitions

There are no explicit mathematical calculations, but special educational needs terms (like "differentiation" and "assessment frameworks") are not clearly defined or contextualised, which may lead to misunderstanding.

Mark: 5/10

Overall Assessment

The overall effectiveness of the written assignment is moderate. While it touches important legislative pieces related to supporting children with special educational needs, the assignment suffers from numerous structural and factual inaccuracies that detract from its academic integrity.

Total Score: 33/60 (55%)

Tips for Improvement

1. Enhance Clarity and Organization: Use headings and subheadings to organize your content logically. This allows readers to follow your arguments more easily.

2. Include Citations: Always reference your sources accurately to avoid plagiarism and lend authority to your writing. This applies particularly to legal documents and international conventions.

3. Proofread Thoroughly: Read your text multiple times to catch grammatical errors and improve sentence structure. Consider using tools such as Grammarly or Hemingway Editor.

4. Deepen Content Knowledge: Familiarize yourself further with the legislative frameworks surrounding special educational needs (SEN) to provide nuanced perspectives in your writing.

5. Expand Definitions: Ensure all educational terms used in your writing are clearly defined to enhance understanding for readers unfamiliar with the subject.

6. Engage with Counterarguments: Include contrasting viewpoints or challenges to the legislation to present a more balanced analysis.

7. Seek Feedback: Before finalizing your work, consider seeking peer review or instructor feedback to identify areas for improvement that you may have overlooked.

By following these tips and refining your writing practices, you will create more compelling, accurate, and professional academic work in the future.