Evaluation of Student's Written Assignment

Evaluation Criteria

1. Grammar and Mechanics: This includes sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling.
2. Factual Correctness: Verification of dates, figures, and claims made.
3. Writing Style: Clarity, coherence, and sophistication of language used.
4. Plagiarism: Assessment of originality and proper citation of sources.
5. Correspondence to the Topic: Relevance to the subject matter of vague pronouns and passive voice.
6. Use of Vague Pronouns: Identification of unclear pronoun references.
7. Use of Passive Voice: Monitoring of passive constructions and their impact on readability.

---

Analysis of Student's Assignment

1. Grammar and Mechanics

• The grammar is generally correct, with a few minor issues such as sentence fragments and comma usage that disrupt flow. Overall, punctuation is used well, but clarity in sentence structure could be improved in certain areas.

2. Factual Correctness

• The dates referenced within the citations appear consistent and accurate according to the context provided (e.g., 2022 and 2023). However, the assignment lacks any specific factual data that is easily verifiable. Recommendations for more specific examples are advised.

3. Writing Style

• The writing style is academic and formal, appropriate for college-level work. However, the complexity of some sentences may obscure understanding, particularly for readers unfamiliar with the topic.

4. Plagiarism

• No instances of direct plagiarism were noted. Citations are provided, but it's essential to ensure proper formatting as per the required style guide (e.g., APA, MLA).

5. Correspondence to the Topic

• The assignment does address the topic, but it does not explicitly define or explore vague pronouns and passive voice in depth. The exploration of method and design lacks acknowledgments of how these grammatical structures impact clarity and engagement in writing.

6. Use of Vague Pronouns

• There are multiple instances where vague pronouns like “this” and “these” are used without clear antecedents. For example:
  • "This methodological choice aligns with the Qualitative Pragmatic Inquiry Business Research Project Plan." — The specificity of what "this" refers to could be improved.
  • "These strategies are embedded within the Qualitative Pragmatic Inquiry framework." — The antecedent for “these” is unclear.

7. Use of Passive Voice

• Passive voice is used throughout the text, which sometimes makes the writing less direct. For instance:
  • "Member checking will be conducted" could be rewritten in active voice as "The researcher will conduct member checking."
  • Reducing the passive voice could enhance clarity and reader engagement.

---

Recommendations for Improvement

1. Clarify Vague Pronouns: Review sentences to ensure all pronouns have clear antecedents. Provide specificity to eliminate ambiguity.

2. Reduce Passive Voice: Aim to use active voice where appropriate to create more dynamic and engaging sentences.

3. Provide Definitions and Examples: Include explicit definitions and examples of vague pronouns and passive voice. This reinforces the importance of clarity in academic writing.

4. Use Clearer Sentence Structures: Simplify overly complex sentences to improve readability and maintain the reader's interest.

5. Check Formatting: Ensure that all citations and references follow the preferred academic style guide. Proper citation formatting adds to the professionalism of the work.

6. Engage with Topic Depth: Discuss the implications of vague pronouns and passive voice on communication and comprehension within academic research to deepen understanding of the topic.

7. Seek Feedback: Before finalizing major assignments, seek peer feedback to gain insights from others that might highlight overlooked elements.

8. Revise and Edit: Allocate time for proofreading to catch grammatical errors and confirm clarity in writing.

Following these recommendations will enhance your writing skills and better prepare you for future assignments in any academic discipline.