Evaluation of the Essay: An Exploration of Corporate Imperialism in Latin America

Criteria for Evaluation

1. Grammar and Spelling: Assess the correct usage of grammar and spelling throughout the essay.
2. Factual Correctness: Ensure that dates, events, and statistics are accurate and supported by credible sources.
3. Writing Style: Evaluate clarity, coherence, and the overall flow of the essay, including the use of appropriate academic language.
4. Plagiarism: Check for originality and proper citation of sources.
5. Correspondence to the Topic: Determine if the essay adequately addresses the topic of corporate imperialism in Latin America.
6. Mathematical and Statistical Accuracy: Verify any numerical data presented.
7. Definitions of Terms: Ensure that the terms used are well-defined and understood.

---

Detailed Evaluation

1. Grammar and Spelling

• Score: 7/10
• Comments: Overall, the grammar is generally correct, but there are some minor errors. For example, "starking" should read "stark" in "this starking statistic."

2. Factual Correctness

• Score: 6/10
• Comments: The claim that the U.S. government orchestrated a coup against Jacobo Arbenz in 1954 is correct but lacks elaboration on the motives and consequences. Additionally, the genocide of millions due to sugar cane or other direct causes in the introduction lacks specific dates and sources. The detail regarding the 200,000 civilian deaths in Guatemala is a well-documented statistic, but the essay does not contextualize it within the broader scope of U.S. interference clearly. Dates, such as when the U.S. first occupied Haiti (1915-1934), should be noted for accuracy.

3. Writing Style

• Score: 8/10
• Comments: The writing is generally clear and coherent, with a logical flow between paragraphs. However, the transitions between ideas could be improved with better linking sentences. The phrase "Evident by their nickname, 'banana republics'" is awkward and could be rephrased for clarity.

4. Plagiarism

• Score: 7/10
• Comments: The essay has several references but does not use a consistent citation format. For instance, "(Han)" and "(Ramirez)" are not linked to a bibliography or reference list, which raises concerns about proper attribution.

5. Correspondence to the Topic

• Score: 8/10
• Comments: The essay effectively addresses corporate imperialism with specific examples from the banana and sugar industries. However, the exploration could be deepened by including more examples of corporate interests and impacts on local economies.

6. Mathematical and Statistical Accuracy

• Score: 7/10
• Comments: The statistic relating to civilian deaths (200,000) is appropriately presented. However, the claim about the deaths caused by sugar cultivation but fails to provide evidence or specific numbers, making it difficult to assess accuracy.

7. Definitions of Terms

• Score: 6/10
• Comments: Terms such as "corporate imperialism," "banana republic," and "batey system" are used but are not adequately defined for clarity. Providing definitions or context for these terms would enhance the essay’s comprehensibility.

---

Overall Assessment

Total Score: 41/70 (Approx. 58% or a low passing grade)

The essay offers valuable insights into corporate imperialism in Latin America, focusing on the banana and sugar industries. While it addresses these topics with relevant examples, it requires improvements in factual correctness, grammar, and proper citation practices. To enhance the quality and rigor of the essay, the student should focus on providing clearer definitions, more accurate historical context, and should adhere to a formal citation style. Overall, with revisions, this essay has the potential to meet the standards expected at a Year 11 level in History.