The provided text appears to be a reflection on an individual's training strategy, integrating insights from both personal experiences and external authoritative sources. Here's a breakdown of the characteristics that may indicate whether it was generated by AI:
The text is well-structured and coherent, presenting a logical flow from the introduction of the collaborative approach to specific training methods. This level of organization is characteristic of both well-written human-crafted content and sophisticated AI outputs.
Referencing specific content creators (Jeff Nippard and Dr. Michael Israetel) adds credibility and specificity, suggesting a level of expertise typically associated with human authorship. However, advanced AI could also mimic this detail based on existing knowledge.
The use of technical language related to fitness and training (e.g., "musculature cues," "hypertrophic position") reflects a knowledgeable perspective that indicates familiarity with the subject, which can be exhibited by both humans and AI trained on fitness topics.
The text includes a personal narrative about learning and collaboration, which indicates a subjective viewpoint more common to human writers. AI typically lacks a genuine personal experience unless modeled to simulate one.
Given the well-organized presentation, specific referencing of credible sources, and a personal narrative style, the probability that this text was generated by AI remains moderate. While an advanced AI could produce similar content, the depth of personal reflection suggests that it was likely crafted by a human author who integrated multiple viewpoints to arrive at a clear conclusion regarding their training approach.