Essay Evaluation for "For a Better Future"

Criteria for Evaluation

1. Grammar and Syntax: Assess the use of correct grammatical structures and sentence construction.
2. Factual Correctness: Verify the truthfulness of statements and the accuracy of referenced events, especially regarding scientific facts (e.g., global warming).
3. Writing Style: Consider the tone, clarity, and organization of the essay, including the use of appropriate vocabulary for a Grade 10 audience.
4. Plagiarism: Check for originality and ensure that the content does not mirror existing works directly.
5. Correspondence to the Topic: Evaluate how well the essay addresses the assigned topic of environmental responsibility.
6. Mathematical Calculations and Definitions: Note any math-related claims, and verify the correctness of definitions and terms used in the essay.
7. Spelling and Word Choice: Check for spelling errors and the appropriateness of word choices.

---

Evaluation

1. Grammar and Syntax

The essay contains multiple grammatical errors, including subject-verb agreement and sentence fragments. For example:

• "The climat is not good right now" should be "The climate is not good right now."
• "I think that more people would take the bus insded of their car." contains a spelling error; "insded" should be "instead".
• There are run-on sentences and awkward phrasing throughout.

Score: 3/10

2. Factual Correctness

The essay discusses the need for environmental action and mentions issues such as global warming, trash pollution, and transportation alternatives. While these are relevant issues, some statements require clarification or correction:

• The mention of "icebears" seems to refer to "polar bears," which is the correct term.
• The claim that "fishes does not know if the trash is food or not" lacks scientific rigor; it could mislead readers about animal behaviors toward pollution.

Score: 5/10

3. Writing Style

The writing is relatively informal and lacks the sophistication expected at the Grade 10 level. Sentence structures are repetitive, and transitions between ideas are lacking. More variety in sentence construction and the inclusion of evidence or examples would improve the style significantly.

Score: 4/10

4. Plagiarism

The essay appears original and does not seem to copy from other sources directly. However, the expressions and ideas are fairly generic and lack individual insight, which could be further developed into original thought.

Score: 7/10

5. Correspondence to the Topic

The essay is focused on environmental issues, which aligns with the topic of creating a better future. However, the suggestions provided are somewhat vague, and more concrete actions could be presented to show a deeper understanding of environmental responsibility.

Score: 6/10

6. Mathematical Calculations and Definitions

While no explicit math calculations or definitions are presented, there are claims regarding financial matters (e.g., bus ticket prices versus car use) that could benefit from numerical data or statistics to strengthen arguments.

Score: 5/10

7. Spelling and Word Choice

There are numerous spelling errors (e.g., "expensiv" for "expensive," "insted" for "instead") and some awkward word choices that detract from the overall readability of the essay. Careful proofreading would help recover some clarity.

Score: 4/10

---

Overall Score: 4.85/10

Feedback Summary

The essay titled "For a Better Future" touches on important environmental issues; however, it requires significant improvement in grammar, factual accuracy, writing style, and clarity. To enhance the quality of the work, the student should:

• Proofread for grammar and spelling errors.
• Use more precise language and terms.
• Include well-structured arguments and examples.
• Present clearer suggestions for environmental actions.

By focusing on these areas, the student can improve both the effectiveness and persuasiveness of their writing.