Titles of parts of the lesson must be formatted as headings. Needed is Lesson plan. The academic subject for which the text must be created ...

Lesson Plan: Conduct Ethical Research and Determine the Relevance of Source Material

Duration

30 Minutes

Year Level

Grade 11

Subject

English

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

Resources

Introduction (5 minutes)

Instructional Activities

Direct Instruction (10 minutes)

  1. Ethical Research Principles:

    • Discuss the importance of integrity in research.
    • Explain the concepts of plagiarism and citing sources.
    • Emphasize the significance of using diverse perspectives to enrich research.
  2. Evaluating Sources:

    • Introduce criteria for evaluating source relevance and credibility:
      • Authority (Who is the author? What are their credentials?)
      • Accuracy (Is the information supported by evidence?)
      • Purpose (What is the intent of the source? Is it biased?)
      • Currency (Is the information up-to-date?)
    • Provide examples of credible vs. non-credible sources.

Group Activity (10 minutes)

Conclusion (5 minutes)

Homework Assignment

Tasks

  1. Choose a research topic of your choice and conduct a brief literature review. Find at least 3 credible sources that you plan to use.
  2. For each source, provide a short paragraph (3-4 sentences) explaining why you believe the source is credible and relevant using the evaluation criteria discussed in class.
  3. Prepare a reference list of your sources in APA format.

Correct Answers (Sample)

  1. Source 1: Smith, J. (2020). The Impact of Social Media on Youth. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(2), 123-130.

    • This source is credible because the author is a well-known researcher in youth studies with numerous publications in this area (Authority). The information is supported by empirical data collected from a large sample of youth (Accuracy). The purpose of this study is to inform readers about potential impacts rather than to promote a specific agenda (Purpose). The article was published recently, ensuring that the information is current (Currency).
  2. Source 2: Brown, L., & Taylor, K. (2021). Social Media and Mental Health: A Review. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/social-media-mental-health

    • This article is credible as it was written by experts in psychology and reviewed by peers (Authority). It includes recent studies and statistics to back up its claims (Accuracy). The intent is to provide a balanced review of the literature, making it unbiased (Purpose). The article was published within the last year, keeping it relevant and up-to-date (Currency).
  3. Source 3: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022). Mental Health Services in Australia: Key Trends. Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mental-health-services/mental-health-services-in-australia

    • This source is a government report, providing reliable statistics and information (Authority and Accuracy). The intention is to inform the public about mental health services, indicating a balanced approach (Purpose). The publication is recent, supporting its relevance (Currency).

Teacher Notes