| aidemia--modules-aicheck_request | Briefly analyze the probability that the provided text have been generated by AI - provide a brief 1-paragraph conclusion. |
| Paste a text for analysis | Over the last half billion years, there have been five major mass extinctions, when the diversity of life on Earth suddenly and dramatically contracted. Scientists are currently monitoring the sixth extinction, predicted to be the most devastating since the asteroid impact that wiped out the dinosaurs. This time around the cataclysm is us. In this book the author tells us why and how human beings have altered life on the planet in a way no species has before. She provides a moving account of the disappearances of various species occurring all around us and traces the evolution of extinction as concept, from its first articulation by Georges Cuvier in revolutionary Paris up to Lyell and Darwin, and through the present day. The sixth extinction is likely to be mankind's most lasting legacy, compelling us to rethink the fundamental question of what it means to be human. |
| Calculate probability percentage | |
| Determine AI provider used | |
| Detailed report | |
| Any other preferences |
The provided text exhibits characteristics commonly associated with AI-generated content. Its structure is coherent and fluid, presenting complex ideas in a clear manner, which is indicative of advanced language models. The text effectively summarizes a complex scientific subject—the history of mass extinctions—while maintaining a compelling narrative style. Key phrases, such as "sixth extinction" and references to historical figures like Georges Cuvier, are presented with factual accuracy and context, typical of well-researched writing.
However, the lack of personal anecdotes or emotional depth can suggest a machine-generated quality, as the text focuses on conveying information rather than evoking emotion. The use of formal language and structured arguments aligns with both human and AI writing styles, making it challenging to definitively attribute authorship.
In conclusion, while the text demonstrates a polished and accurate reflection of a significant topic, its clinical tone and structured presentation raise the probability that it could have been generated by AI. Nonetheless, given that such coherent and well-informed human-generated content also exists, it remains uncertain whether this specific piece is AI-generated or authored by a knowledgeable individual.